[aprssig] Doubling APRS messaging in ham radio overnight

Kenton A. Hoover shibumi at mail.marchordie.org
Mon Jan 26 17:46:49 EST 2009

Is beaconing no longer permissable? It was always in the eye of the  

Text and URLs mangled by my iPhone
Kenton A. Hoover
shibumi at mail.marchordie.org

On Jan 26, 2009, at 14:36, Duane Whittingham <n9ssn at arrl.net> wrote:

> I wonder if some consider it one way so its broadcasting?
> If it can be defined as informative like a bulletin then maybe?
> Duane - N9SSN
> At 09:59 AM 1/26/2009, you wrote:
> On 1/26/2009, "Earl Needham" <needhame1 at plateautel.net wrote:
> Ben Jackson wrote:
>  Older, working pagers are a dime a dozen on the used market and  
> there are
>  some people who have refitted them to work on Amateur bands[2].  
> With the
>  fact that there (quite literally) buckets full of working pagers at
>  HamFests, why not have a "messagegate" that takes APRS messages to
>  stations and translates them to a message destined for a POCSAG
>  compatible pager. There were certain KAM TNCs that could encode  
>  natively
>     Years ago I had a pager converted to receive on 146.76, our local
> repeater.  We had a new controller that would send paging tones to  
> open
> it up.  Sadly, after about 3 uses, the "old fogeys" decided it was
> illegal.  We had quite the discussion, and one of them finally called
> the FCC monitoring office in Powder Springs, Ga, and simply asked
> them,"Paging isn't legal on amateur frequencies, is it?"
> This *is* a concern and I'm curious as to how the FCC looks at paging
> for amateur stations by amateur stations. The only real "paging
> network" I've seen is based in Germany. Nothing on this side of the
> Atlantic.
> I'm sure there are people smarter then me on this list. Any opinions  
> on
> this? Part 97 is murky at best.
>     If you try this, be prepared for other "old fogeys" to step in and
> try to take the fun our of amateur radio.
> Fogeys don't need to be old :). Every project needs to be championed  
> by
> someone who can tilt at windmills. The next step was to call the FCC  
> and
> the ARRL to get their interpretation of the tomes. Paging in this  
> sense
> may be something that is not supported under Part 97, which is part of
> the reason I haven't tried to really push this (other reasons being
> time and money). I just decided to toss it out there in this thread
> partially to get input from other people regarding it.
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Amateur Radio Operator
> Duane Whittingham - N9SSN
> Skywarn, ARES, SATERN
> City of Chicago CERT Member
> Red Cross Disaster Services Technology Member
> Red Cross ECRV Certified
> _______________________________________________
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at tapr.org
> https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig

More information about the aprssig mailing list