[aprssig] REF: HF Net? How About 20M ?
Dave Baxter
Dave at emv.co.uk
Mon May 26 13:46:37 EDT 2008
Oooo, please no! Keep 14.100 clear for the NCDXF IBP project. There is
more than enough QRM on 20m round there already without APRS/packet type
stuff too... It's bad enough with RTTY contests!
The IBP also uses 18.110, 21.150, 24.930 & 28.200. A lack of
QRM/Splatter etc, is much appreciated round these.
Cheers.
Dave G0WBX.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthew Stennett [mailto:wa4tkg at iwon.com]
> Sent: 26 May 2008 02:08
> To: aprssig at lists.tapr.org
> Subject: [aprssig] REF: HF Net? How About 20M ?
>
>
> I have long believed we should have a 20M APRS frequency.
>
> I have had little to NO success in getting many stations on 30M APRS.
>
> There has always been a presence of Packet on 20M, the .105
> Net is proof of that.
>
> There should be an APRS spot, either 5KHz above ? or below
> the .105 Net.
>
> ...that's my 2c worth.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: g0jxn.jim [mailto: g0jxn.jim at ntlworld.com]
>
>
>
> Cc: aprssig at lists.tapr.org
>
> Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 07:26:00 +0100
>
> Subject: HF Net
>
>
>
> Sorry again for being off subject but there are few places to
> air this.
>
> I received no responses to my original message below so if
> anyone is interested in joining me in setting up such a net please
>
> contact me direct or check my web site under the 'aprs hf net'
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
>
>
This mail has been scanned by Palmer Cook Computer Services Limited. www.palmercook.co.uk
More information about the aprssig
mailing list