[aprssig] APRS Message workarounds

[Jason KG4WSV]

On Jan 16, 2008 2:15 PM, Robert Bruninga <bruninga at usna.edu> wrote:


> 2) Recognize that your message had 2 to 4 times higher chance of
> getting through then you will ever see in getting an ACK back.


This (and many of your other statements about how messaging works) makes the
assumption that there is a 50% packet loss per hop.

Has any testing been done to see if this assumption is correct?

Show your work, please.  (:

-Jason
kg4wsv
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig_lists.tapr.org/attachments/20080116/b4d3a5e5/attachment.html>