[aprssig] Old Digi_Ned Refurb

[Steve Jones]

> To be reliable on
> demand, APRS must have consistent performance expectations for
> users and not be at the whim of each digi owner to be changing
> the intent of the sender,

But what if the intent of the sender isn't compatible with the new  
paradigm?

I'm one of those draconian node ops who takes paths greater then  
WIDE3-3 and rewrites them so they fit the new paradigm.

I also take the old RELAY and TRACE paths and convert them into  
something more appropriate.

Anything else that conforms is left alone.

I'd rather give somebody who's not quite figured out the new paradigm  
out yet a shot at getting into the network rather then just dropping  
their packets.

Digi_Ned is great for modifying non-compliant paths.

--
Steve <steve.jones at rogers.com>



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig_lists.tapr.org/attachments/20070914/fba5f3af/attachment.html>