[aprssig] Is my PIC-E transmitting incorrect LAT tracking data
EXT-Maetta, John
john.maetta at boeing.com
Tue Jan 9 10:49:34 EST 2007
Tapio,
Thank you for your reply. Yes, I have the 'Special' atribute set. It
makes more sense to me now.
73,
John
-----Original Message-----
From: Tapio Sokura [mailto:oh2kku at iki.fi]
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 9:42 PM
To: TAPR APRS Mailing List
Subject: Re: [aprssig] Is my PIC-E transmitting incorrect LAT tracking
data
EXT-Maetta, John wrote:
> Is my TAPR PIC-E is transmitting incorrect LAT data. My location is
> 34.xxxxN, 120.xxxxW which is in grid CM94.
>
> The PIC-E is transmitting the following LAT data: 3xxxxx. Shouldn't
> it be sending Sxxxxx for a LAT? The APRS spec is a bit confusing but
> I think I can manualy decode MIC-E APRS packets correctly.
If you look at the APRS 1.01 specification PDF file pages 43 and 44,
you'll see the following:
1) The first character of the destination field contains both the first
latitude digit (tens of degrees) and message bit A. Nothing more,
nothing less. Especially note that the N/S indicator is encoded in the
4th character.
2) Thus for 30 degrees (north or south), the first character can be
either 3, D, or S. The only difference between these is the message bit
A, which can be either zero, one (custom), or one (standard). A '3' says
that the message bit A is zero.
The mic-e message bit table on page 45 says that if message bit A is
zero, the possible messages are "committed", "special", "priority",
"emergency" or "custom" messages 4-6. So you probably have one of those
messages configured in your pic-e.
Tapio
_______________________________________________
aprssig mailing list
aprssig at lists.tapr.org
https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
More information about the aprssig
mailing list