[aprssig] Packet Node on 144.390 ?

[Steve Huston]

On 9/13/06 3:09 AM, Ray McKnight wrote:
> WinLink *is* far superior simply
> because it generally relies on Pactor which is several magnitudes more
> efficient than packet. 

Well, I think the topic at hand was about VHF packet, so while your
later statement might hold true that HF pactor is more efficient, I have
to address one major issue I have with this.  WinLink will never be an
option for me, no matter how "superior", until it runs on a superior
operating system :>

[puts on Nomex underwear]

-- 
Steve Huston - W2SRH - Unix Sysadmin, Dept. of Astrophysical Sciences
  Princeton University  |    ICBM Address: 40.346525   -74.651285
    126 Peyton Hall     |"On my ship, the Rocinante, wheeling through
  Princeton, NJ   08544 | the galaxies; headed for the heart of Cygnus,
    (609) 258-7375      | headlong into mystery."  -Rush, 'Cygnus X-1'