[aprssig] Re: The best resolution of position from APRS

KC2MMi kc2mmi at verizon.net
Thu Jan 5 18:09:50 EST 2006


<<No, this [range circles, blobs]
 has been in APRSdos from the beginning.>>
  And....for those of us who kissed DOS goodbye despite our love for it a decade
ago, what authors besides you have given it ANY consideration? Bill Gates
actually lied to IBM when he promised a GUI in the first version of PC-DOS, it
wasn't delivered until some time later on and to this day, the graphics
capabilities of DOS and DOS systems simply are not up to what other systems
are/do. When MS "Live" (the Terraserver) and Google Earth offer DOS versions,
then I'll think about running a dedicated DOS box and APRSdos.
 Sorry, Bob, for me and lot of other people, DOS gets lumped in with Unix and
Commodore. All fine things--just not gonna happen here now.
 I give you credit for "doing it right" but how about getting some college
programming class to port APRSdos to Windows as a class programming project? Can
you challenge some programmers at Annapolis or anyplace else into doing a

<<APRSdos does not do this
for position ambiguities below 60 feet...>>
 And that's another problem, with WAAS GPS becoming the standard even for the
least expensive GPSes, there's a need to support at least DDD.MM.mmm all the way
to the display.

Incidentally...Did I miss it? Or did you never explain why or how your DD.MM.HH
format differs from the conventional DDD.MM.mm and DDD.MM.mmm to express decimal
minutes? I'm still confused over that.

More information about the aprssig mailing list