[aprssig] SAW filters/di(du)plexer
Stephen H. Smith
wa8lmf2 at aol.com
Wed Sep 7 13:15:47 EDT 2005
>
> You're right... it would be a nightmare for a retrofit. Furthermore,
> you'd never get the isolation you'd need, just sticking them down to a
> board (at least, not without a lot of cut and try or development
> time.. Cellphones get 100dB+ isolation but they also spend millions of
> dollars of engineer time to get there.
>
>
The real advantage cellphones have is that the TX/RX split is 45 MHz at
800 MHz. This is the equivalent of a 8 MHz split on two meters! Even
simple lumped-constant L/C hipass/lopass diplexers can almost achieve
the required isolation at this kind of separation. Especially when you
consider that the max TX power of a cell handset is only a few hundred
milliwatts....
The main reason for using SAW filters is compactness and a flat passband
that will pass 800+ adjacent channels uniformly; not extraordinary
levels of isolation.
Stephen H. Smith wa8lmf (at) aol.com
EchoLink Node: 14400 [Think bottom of the 2M band]
Home Page: http://wa8lmf.com
"APRS 101" Explanation of APRS Path Selection & Digipeating
http://webs.lanset.com/wa8lmf/DigiPaths
Updated APRS Symbol Chart
http://webs.lanset.com/wa8lmf/miscinfo/APRS_Symbol_Chart.pdf
New/Updated "Rev G" APRS http://webs.lanset.com/wa8lmf/aprs
Symbols Set for UI-View,
UIpoint and APRSplus:
More information about the aprssig
mailing list