[aprssig] APRS Voice Alert
A.J. Farmer (AJ3U)
farmer.aj at gmail.com
Wed Sep 7 12:11:44 EDT 2005
On 9/7/05, Dave Baxter <dave at emv.co.uk> wrote:
>I'm not in any way saying it's not a good idea. Just perhaps it's
>misguided to propose it's widespread use on a national APRS frequency.
Yes, you are correct. The only stations that should be using it are
mobile or portable stations. It should not have widespread use. A
home user or obviously a digi should not use voicealert because that
wouldn't make any sense.
The purpose of voicealert is to help set up a voice contact for the
mobile or portable station. It should be used only by an attended
station that wishes to "participate". Running it unattended or on a
wide coverage station is counterproductive and only invites problems.
>an excelent tool,
>so long as the station's hardware supports it, and an awful lot of it
>doesnt!...
Hmmm.. most radios these days support tone squelch, don't they?
Actually, they don't even need to support APRS. I keep 144.39 CT100
in the scan list of my mobile (non-APRS) radio of my wife's car. It
doesn't transmit, but it does listen for voicealert stations.
More information about the aprssig
mailing list