[aprssig] Re: diplexer/duplexers for APRS
Stephen H. Smith
wa8lmf2 at aol.com
Tue Sep 6 22:12:53 EDT 2005
kkotch at earthlink.net wrote:
>radio 1 is a dual-band, radio 2 is a 2m packet radio all connected to 1
>dual-band antenna. Both sides of the dual-band and the packet radio can
>receive at the same time. It's only when one of the three transmits,
>(actually it would be when one of the two radios transmits) that the others
>need to have the rf blocked. When the packet radio transmits, the signal is
>blocked from backfeeding through the coax to the other radio.
>
[ I assume the "dual-band" radio means 2M/450; i.e. VHF/UHF ]
Huh?? All connected to one antenna? If you are actually connecting
two radios to one antenna with a T connector or something similar,
NOTHING is preventing one radio from "backfeeding" into the other and
you are almost certainly going to blow out the front end of the other
radio.
>When the
>dual-band transmits the internal duplexer there protects one side and the
>external duplexer circuit protects the packet radio.
>
>
>
Only if the two radios are on DIFFERENT BANDS, not just different
frequencies. That is, only if the dualband is transmitting on UHF.
You CANNOT isolate two radios on the SAME band with a simple diplexer.
The external diplexer is a band-sensitive device (just like the internal
one) and since presumably the separate packet radio is using the
VHF-only port of the diplexer, the dual-bander must be connected to the
UHF-only port of the diplexer. As a result, you will only be able to
transmit and receive on the UHF half of the dualbander since the
external diplexer WILL NOT pass 2M on the UHF port. [You might transmit
on VHF and be heard 50-100 feet away, but not much farther due to the
40-50 db loss that the diplexer's UHF passband will inflict on a VHF
signal. ]
>If it can be done in any dual-band, dual-receive radio, why can't it be done
>outside the radio?
>
>Keith, KF4BXT
>
>
>
Because you are trying to use two frequencies on the SAME BAND. As I
explained in my previous post, these diplexer devices are simple
hi-pass/lo-pass filters with the "UHF" side passing everything above 300
MHz or so, and the "VHF" side passing everything below 300 MHz.
Simple diplexers can only combine or isolate DIFFERENT BANDS. They
CANNOT isolate different frequencies on the SAME band. The only
reason the diplexer inside the dual radio works is because the two haves
of this radio ARE ON DIFFERENT BANDS.
>-----Original Message-----
>From: aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org [mailto:aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org]
>On Behalf Of Jim Lux
>Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 8:18 PM
>To: aprssig at lists.tapr.org
>Subject: [aprssig] diplexer/duplexers for APRS
>
>It occurs to me that since APRS is a single frequency kind of operation,
>you might be able to get a SAW filter made that just passes 25kHz around
>144.39, and another that rejects the 25kHz around that same frequency
>(actually, it might be the same filter).
>
>
>
>
SAW filters are low power devices suitable only for receiving. You
can't place them in the external antenna line where they would be
exposed to transmit power. Inserting these into the D700 would require
extensive internal hacking of the D700 to insert these devices in low
level receive-only front end circuitry inside the radio. In turn, this
would be a major undertaking since the D700 doesn't have the traditional
metal cans interconnected by mini-coax with RCA connectors for it's
receiver frontend, mixer, IF block, etc. EVERYTHING RF, IF, audio and
digital, except for the TX PA, are on a single PC board. This means
hacking PC traces with an Xacto knife and tacking on coax jumpers
running to external filters.
For some pics of the inside of the D700, visit this page on my website:
http://webs.lanset.com/wa8lmf/ham/index.htm
Scroll about 3/4 of the way down the page and look for the topic
*"Interior Views of Kenwood TM-D700 146/440 Dual-Bander with built-in TNC"
*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig_lists.tapr.org/attachments/20050906/9721ed66/attachment.html>
More information about the aprssig
mailing list