[aprssig] WIDEs
Curt, WE7U
archer at eskimo.com
Wed Jan 5 17:27:59 EST 2005
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005, Robert Bruninga wrote:
> Curt, you dont understand callsign-substitution.
Actually, it's not the callsign-substitution that is fuzzy here,
it's what the digi does with the "digipeated" bits and the
already-digipeated/substituted callsigns.
> Once a digi's own call shows up anywhere in the path,
> it will not ever digipeat that packet again. Period.
> Thus, it will not ping-pong.
I'm glad of that, but I didn't think that was the case. As I
understood it they ignored all but the first digipeater slot that
didn't have the has-been-digipeated bit set. In other words they
never did a compare between any of those fields and the callsign of
the digi.
> But it will digi other copies that went via other
> digis before it got to it. Yes, those are dupes, but
> the only radiate outward. They cannot come back
> through this digi in "ping-pong" fashion. Bob
I believe I've seen it happen recently. I think it was a kpc3 or
kpc-3+ that did it. I might be able to check through my logs at
home to find an example of it on local RF.
--
Curt, WE7U. APRS Client Comparisons: http://www.eskimo.com/~archer
"Lotto: A tax on people who are bad at math." -- unknown
"Windows: Microsoft's tax on computer illiterates." -- WE7U
"The world DOES revolve around me: I picked the coordinate system!"
More information about the aprssig
mailing list