[aprssig] Igates Are A Fair Weather Solution (was: "Finito")
Jason Winningham
jdw at eng.uah.edu
Sun Aug 28 19:08:12 EDT 2005
My understanding of the NewN-N paradigm is that the state/regional
prefix (e.g. FLn-n) was designed specifically _not_ to be limited for
the very reason you're talking about. If FLn-n is being limited,
somebody missed the point.
If weather info is such a critical use of your network, perhaps a
separate network is in order?
> I used to enjoy seeing 150 to 250 stations coming in
> on RF APRS each day here in Central Florida. Yes, the single
> 1200 baud APRS channel IS sufficient to accomplish this.
Maybe, but if those 150 to 250 stations are transmitting very often,
your network is dropping a _lot_ of packets. I suspect there is very
little reliability in such a network. I certainly wouldn't want to
depend on it for critical weather info.
Does NWS distribute alerts via RF in some data format?
-Jason
kg4wsv
More information about the aprssig
mailing list