[aprssig] Coverage in the National Parks

Germino mgermino at sbcglobal.net
Thu Apr 7 11:41:42 EDT 2005

> Because when using the 2 hop path of WIDE1-1,WIDE2-1
> the first hop has already been accounted for so the second
> hop should already be decremented by one.

Just to fully understand this... If your path is WIDE1-1,WIDE3-1
you would create the same number of packets as the example above.

Also, if all heck breaks loose and in an emergency your nearest I-gates are 
5 hops away and you need to make it there. (EMERGENCY)  A path of WIDE6-5 
would still work in this new APRS environment we are looking at.  Correct?


More information about the aprssig mailing list