[aprssig] UiView32 Registrations
Vince
heffer at mindspring.com
Mon Apr 4 23:15:16 EDT 2005
Scott,
Rationalize all you want, it does not change things, or the wishes of
the programmer.
A grave robber is a grave robber, no matter how you want rationalize
it.
Vince
scott at opentrac.org wrote:
> The only one who could place it in the public domain would be the
> copyright holder (I'm assuming that's Dee unless Roger made other
> arrangements), at least until the copyright expires. Which, with the
> way legislation is going these days, will be in about 300 years, at
> least in the US.
>
> I see a registration patch more as a way to make sure the program as it
> exists now stays usable. The source code is gone - there's never going
> to be any way to add any significant functionality or modify how it
> operates beyond trivial tweaks that can be made in an object-level
> debugger. And trust me, even those require some significant effort.
> But if a companion program was released, capable of either disabling the
> registration requirement or generating valid keys while explaining
> Roger's wishes, it could go on being used (and generating donations)
> whether there are volunteers still handing out registrations with their
> secret keygens or not.
>
> Scott
> N1VG
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org
> [mailto:aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org]*On Behalf Of *Rich Garcia
> *Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2005 7:39 PM
> *To:* TAPR APRS Mailing List
> *Subject:* RE: [aprssig] UiView32 Registrations
>
> It was Rogers wishes that the code not be placed into public domain
> and destroyed after his passing. Patches and fixes would I believe
> going against his last wishes, no flames please don't shoot the
> messenger. I may not agree with it but I do respect a persons last
> wishes.
>
> Rich
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org
> [mailto:aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org]*On Behalf Of
> *scott at opentrac.org
> *Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2005 9:48 PM
> *To:* 'TAPR APRS Mailing List'
> *Subject:* RE: [aprssig] UiView32 Registrations
>
> Or what, you might get some unlicensed rogue hooking it up to
> their scanner? Unlicensed transmissions are an issue for the
> FCC (or other local regulatory body.) They're not supposed to
> even be buying transmitters if they're not licensed, right?
> They can't get gated back to RF without the server login
> string. Which you can already generate yourself anyway... but
> it needn't be part of the patch.
>
> I have the utmost respect for Roger and his work. I had a
> number of friendly email conversations with him before he passed
> on. I'm not interested in going against his wishes - I just
> don't see that the current system is fulfilling them any more
> than a registrationless system would.
>
> How about a patch program that pops up an explanation of the
> donation request, with an 'I understand and agree' checkbox
> before applying the patch? Maybe with some hyperlinks to the
> American Cancer Society, Cancer Research UK, and so on? That's
> honestly what I expected from the registration website, and I
> was surprised not to see it.
>
> Scott
> N1VG
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org
> [mailto:aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org]*On Behalf Of *Germino
> *Sent:* Monday, April 04, 2005 6:25 PM
> *To:* TAPR APRS Mailing List
> *Subject:* Re: [aprssig] UiView32 Registrations
>
>
>
>>Can someone tell me why there's even a registration requirement? I thought
>>donations were entirely voluntary now.
>>
>>
>>
>>Don't we still need to make sure that it's a Ham that is using the program? (for Igateing to RF) Or am I mistaken?
>>
>>
>>
>>Mike
>>
>>AD6AA
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at lists.tapr.org
> https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
More information about the aprssig
mailing list