[aprssig] Why RELAY,WIDE... is so bad....
Curt, WE7U
archer at eskimo.com
Fri Apr 1 11:57:36 EST 2005
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Wes Johnston wrote:
> I think that the recommended path for mobiles should become:
> WIDE1-1,WIDE2-2
> or
> WIDE1-1,WIDE3-3
>
> Of course the sets the minimum number of hops to 3. The rule of thumb
> would become never run WIDE1-1 after the first position.
Oooh. Not good. I can see getting into a lot of problems with
people not knowing that and trying that, in an effort to reduce
their path.
Instead what about using "RELAY1-1,WIDE2-2", and setting up houses
and the hilltop digis to respond to that instead? Same concept as
above but people can then still run "RELAY1-1,WIDE1-1" and not hurt
anything. This is assuming that the hilltop digi's can do flooding
protocol using any text string. Is that true, or does flooding
protocol and specifically the dupe-checking only work for WIDEn-N
and TRACEn-N? If they can't do these two: "WIDEn-N" and
"RELAYn-N", then forget what I just said.
--
Curt, WE7U. APRS Client Comparisons: http://www.eskimo.com/~archer
"Lotto: A tax on people who are bad at math." -- unknown
"Windows: Microsoft's tax on computer illiterates." -- WE7U
"The world DOES revolve around me: I picked the coordinate system!"
More information about the aprssig
mailing list