[aprssig] The New N-N paradigm CAN WORK
Phillip B. Pacier
ad6nh at arrl.net
Thu Oct 28 12:58:07 EDT 2004
Rick Green wrote:
>Well, yes, I could work, but it will take much coordination to define the
>LANn-N areas, and travelling users will have to pay attention to where
>they are and keep adjusting their path accordingly.
>
>
Not if you take Bob's suggestion and program digis to respond to RELAY.
Not necessarily all digis, but low-level digis or certain home
stations. This was the plan in Southern California years back, when
most of the high-level digis dropped RELAY support all together.
Several home stations in the area handle the RELAY traffic.
I agree that mobiles should be able to set one path and not have to
worry about changing it. That certainly would be a priority goal on my
list. Particulary for those running TT3s, etc., but even for those
running Kenwoods - it's a pain to be constantly updating the path.
73
Phil - AD6NH
http://www.aprsca.net
More information about the aprssig
mailing list